Amy Grace Academy Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Amy Grace Academy - Essay Example On going through the appropriate websites, AGA has come to know that government grants are announced each year to release grant money of up to $30,000 for new projects (Ron Wainrib). AGA is also aware that this fund is accessible to lots more people. Hence, to make a case for winning the grant it is necessary to write a concrete proposal with information concerning the need and other details and make these as accessible as possible to the grantor. The need for digital technologies is to supplement facilities for testing speaking skills. Today, there is great need for trained workers with speaking skills and abilities. The communication business is doing well and we wish to give our students the means to take a look at something that they may be involved in at some point in the future. An article on "Delivering a Quality Grant Proposal" (Don Peek) provides some ideas on writing a proposal. The article is well written but it does appear that the grantor need details of the way the money will be spent from the time it is disbursed to the moment of success when the digital technologies are installed and are successfully used by the students. Details about the information that must be provided in the proposals do not appear very encouraging. First, there are the objectives to be listed followed by another list explaining how they are proposed to be achieved. Next, there are goals and the timelines when the goals are likely to be achieved. What is petrifying is the fact that after having provided all details in the proposal, the end result could be a damp squib. But, on second thoughts, is it worth taking all the trouble to see if the grant would be available After all, there are other ways and means to raise the required funds. AGA could use these means to raise funds. It is in better position to make a general proposal and circulate it among the parents and other well-wishers. There is no question about the funds coming in. Although AGA does not have any idea how much money could be collected in this fashion, it is better to follow this route where there is a guarantee of raising funds (D.M. Mithani, p253). Of course, AGA could alter information somewhat to make the proposal appear meaningful to the grantors. AGA could mention in the proposal that the digital technology is for use in the Science department (Science and Technology). But this would not be fair or ethical. Ultimately, the purpose of making a proposal for the grant will not be defeated if it is made alongside a general fund raising campaign. It is like having the cake and eating it too. Nonetheless, this is a better approach than solely depending on the grant which may or may not come (Damodar Gujarati & Sangeetha, p496). Conclusion Each part of the source supports specific aspects of the grant application requirements. D.M. Mithani outlines loans provided by banks to make high-cost purchases with low-interest loans. Loans are no equivalent to grants but they are quick means to have funds and can be repaid on easy installments. Damodar Gujarati and Sangeetha explains the means for forecasting. Description of the NIH Guide for Grants, Contracts and Recovery Act and